When you include the American Institute for Cancer Research in your estate plans, you make a major difference in the fight against cancer.

Corporate Champions who partner with the American Institute for Cancer Research stand at the forefront of the fight against cancer

The Continuous Update Project (CUP) is an ongoing program that analyzes global research on how diet, nutrition and physical activity affect cancer risk and survival.

A major milestone in cancer research, the Third Expert Report analyzes and synthesizes the evidence gathered in CUP reports and serves as a vital resource for anyone interested in preventing cancer.

AICR has pushed research to new heights, and has helped thousands of communities better understand the intersection of lifestyle, nutrition, and cancer.

Read real-life accounts of how AICR is changing lives through cancer prevention and survivorship.

We bring a detailed policy framework to our advocacy efforts, and provide lawmakers with the scientific evidence they need to achieve our objectives.

AICR champions research that increases understanding of the relationship between nutrition, lifestyle, and cancer.

AICR’s resources can help you navigate questions about nutrition and lifestyle, and empower you to advocate for your health.

AICR is committed to putting what we know about cancer prevention into action. To help you live healthier, we’ve taken the latest research and made 10 Cancer Prevention Recommendations.

January 16, 2014 | 2 minute read

Trends in Cancer Prevention Research

Like last year, I created a Google Spreadsheet to query raw publication counts from PubMed of food/nutrition/health terms from an AICR/WCRF report. This is a way to visualize how nutrition and cancer research may be changing over time. The counts represent the number of published articles containing the term in column A plus “cancer” in the title or abstract.

Like last year, I used the following color scheme from the AICR report: the coloring reflects the strongest confidence for an association between the term and a decreased or increased risk for at least one cancer type. Terms with a yellow background were not in the document list and added by me.

The spreadsheet is sorted by column D: the percentage of papers published in 2013 compared to 2012. This will still change as PubMed will be indexing papers published in 2013 for some time, but the spreadsheet auto-updates daily so it will become more accurate over time. Column M shows the average publication count change per year over the last 6 years (2008 to 2013), which may better reflect the recent trend.

Here are a couple graphs showing the top 6 fastest and slowest topic growth (by publication count) from 2008-2012. This shows more long-term trends.

The caveats: if relevant papers do not contain the term (or contain some other variation) in the title or abstract, publication count may not accurately reflect trends. For simplicity, this method does not make a distinction by publication type (eg trials, reviews, etc).

Measures of the relative importance of the work are also not considered (nor do I know how they could be objectively and accurately). However, terms more confidently associated with cancer tend to have higher publication counts, which suggests that this should reflect general research trends.

Colby Vorland, MSc is a nutrition science graduate student. He blogs about various research topics in nutrition at http://www.nutsci.org and is on Twitter @nutsci.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More From the Blog

Close