When you include the American Institute for Cancer Research in your estate plans, you make a major difference in the fight against cancer.

Corporate Champions who partner with the American Institute for Cancer Research stand at the forefront of the fight against cancer

The Continuous Update Project (CUP) is an ongoing program that analyzes global research on how diet, nutrition and physical activity affect cancer risk and survival.

A major milestone in cancer research, the Third Expert Report analyzes and synthesizes the evidence gathered in CUP reports and serves as a vital resource for anyone interested in preventing cancer.

Whether you are a healthcare provider, a researcher, or just someone who wants to learn more about cancer prevention, we’re here to help.

AICR has pushed research to new heights, and has helped thousands of communities better understand the intersection of lifestyle, nutrition, and cancer.

Read real-life accounts of how AICR is changing lives through cancer prevention and survivorship.

We bring a detailed policy framework to our advocacy efforts, and provide lawmakers with the scientific evidence they need to achieve our objectives.

AICR champions research that increases understanding of the relationship between nutrition, lifestyle, and cancer.

AICR’s resources can help you navigate questions about nutrition and lifestyle, and empower you to advocate for your health.

AICR is committed to putting what we know about cancer prevention into action. To help you live healthier, we’ve taken the latest research and made 10 Cancer Prevention Recommendations.

February 17, 2011 | 2 minute read

A Taxing Problem: Should Sugary Beverages Be Taxed?

Should sugary beverages be taxed? This was the topic of a forum I attended at an American Dietetic Association meeting last week.

Michael Jacobson, Executive Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest took the pro-tax side and Richard A. Williams, Director of Policy Research at George Mason University took the no-tax side.

Here are the main points they made in their arguments:

Pro-tax

1.            Research shows a direct relationship between consumption of sugary soft drinks and an increase in the risk of overweight and obesity,* which in turn promote diabetes and other chronic diseases.

2            Health-care costs related to obesity total about $150 billion per year.

3.            Jacobson cited a study showing that a ten cents tax on one can of soda would reduce consumption by 15%.

4.            Revenue raised from this tax could be used for campaigns and education to promote healthy eating.

Against tax:

1.            It is not the government’s role to single out foods that we should or shouldn’t be eating. What we decide to eat is one of our most personal choices.

2.            Only a very large tax on these beverages would be effective at changing behavior. There aren’t many good economic studies on food taxation, but the ones there are show that consumers will pay more for the taxed goods.

3.            Even with a large tax that changed behavior, the change in people’s weight would be minimal. Williams cited one study showing that a tax that adds 40% cost to these beverages would lead to about a person losing one pound in one year (that’s a decrease of about 8 calories per day).

4.            There are better solutions to the problem such as simpler labeling, more education in schools on healthy eating and focusing on portion sizes and overall diets.

What do you think? Should sugary beverages be taxed? If so, how much?

*AICR’s expert report found a probable link between sugary drinks and weight gain, overweight and obesity.

2 comments on “A Taxing Problem: Should Sugary Beverages Be Taxed?

  1. Sheila Halpin on

    I definitely agree with Mr. Jacobson that sugary beverages should be taxed because it has been shown that such a measure will reduce consumption of empty, non-nutritional calories.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More From the Blog

Close